Expansion (Interaction Poem III)

Architectural Diagram's picture
Expansion Cover Photo.png

"Interaction Poem III is representative of a work where linguistic understanding is eschewed for purely conceptual reasoning / interaction."

Author: 
Architectural Diagram
Made For: 
testing

Comments

sergiocornaga's picture

I find these too minimal to

I find these too minimal to understand. I wonder if they would benefit from either a detailed writeup of your intentions, or from something like narrative content; a contextless void may not be the clearest way to communicate the function of your "new grammar".

Architectural Diagram's picture

Yeah, that makes a lot of

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense, these are pretty bare-bones and essentially entirely conceptual/graphical as far as actual content goes. At this stage what I'm doing is unabashedly dumb. I'm basically making what are essentially tech demos for weird shit someone might do with punctuation, which is something I don't see a lot of in twine. I think we have placing language and semantic meaning across iterative spaces down pretty well, but what can we do with pieces of the English language that don't have an express meaning when isolated, like commas or quotation marks? So what I'm looking at now is seeing what I can think of re: the above and implement it. What I guess I'm saying is that I'm going to be looking at implementing context with time. Interaction Poem II (which I'm still working on), for example, explores the ideas with quotation marks in Stimulation more fully by creating a context.

But yeah, I acknowledge that these might come off as being pretty dumb and/or not having a lot of effort put into them and/or being incomprehensible, which is a risk (or maybe the point of) minimalism.

sergiocornaga's picture

I look forward to

I look forward to Interaction Poem II, then! I don't want to discourage what you're doing, so sorry if I gave that impression. Experimentation is valuable.

explaining your intention probably makes the whole thing better

I don't see how you'll get narrative content in this thing, but looking forward to see the first attempt :)

I don't know how that fits in your intellectual-chic style intent, not to mention the irony you want to put in this, but sergio is right, explaining your intention probably makes the whole thing better.

Ok, now about Interaction Poem III : I don't understand what this have to do with punctuation units and/or iteration, so I'm pretty confused at the moment.

Architectural Diagram's picture

maybe the phrase "narrative

maybe the phrase "narrative content" is too kind. prose + narrative, the most widely-consumed and "prestigious" textual form of our era and thus remains resistant to morphological changes. poetry/"critical" prose/cooking recipes/pictographs/non-prosaic narratives/non-semantic narratives/essays/bus schedules/memos/advertisements/"statuses"/instruction manuals/formless pieces of text, therefore, are more ripe to be changed and ripped apart by twine specifically and hypertext more generally. that is, i'm looking at twine not as a prose-medium (which has been extensively explored by porpentine et al) by twine as a poetic medium, which has an interest in minimalist kinds of expression and also conceptual ways of interacting with its own artifice. when somebody makes a poem in twine today it's a "poem in twine"--it could largely still exist as a poem on the physical page (which isn't true of prose works in twine--creating a "choose your own adventure" book out of Howling Dogs would be darn near impossible) and are generally uncreative uses of a brand new medium, with a few shining exceptions (that one poem by spinach, for example). I'm exploring compressions of style and corruptions of language/punctuation/symbolistic information to pave the way for a richer kind of hypertext poem, hypothetically. Alternatively, I'm faffing about (which is what poetry is in the first place, anyway)